Recent Articles

May 2026 | Opening Article

What Does a Friend and a Merchant Have in Common? Changatham as an Economic Archive of Early Modern Malabar

Afeef Ahmed, Harvard University

Volume I | Number IV | Pages 1-6

November 2025 | Opening Article

Intellectual History as Political History

Sam Phoenix Clarke, University of Cambridge

Volume I | Number II | Pages 1-7

November 2025 | Research Commentary

Performing Sovereignty: Political Authority in the Postcolony 

Dr. Muhammad Suhail Mohamed Yazid, Harvard University

Volume I | Number II | Pages 8-17

November 2025 | Research Commentary

Caste Power, Land Politics, and Urban Inequality in Post-Liberalised India

Dr. Ajay Kumar Gautam, Kautilya School of Public Policy India

Volume I | Number II | Pages 18-30

November 2025 | Methods & Approaches

Why microhistory matters: Meaning, method, and significance

Dr. Riya Gupta, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU)

Volume I | Number II

August 2025 | Research Commentary

Empire’s Labouring Women

Urvi Khaitan, Harvard University

Volume I | Number I | Pages 3-14

August 2025 | Research Commentary

Whither Goes “Indian Secularism”?

Rohit Dutta Roy, University of Cambridge

Volume I | Number I | Pages 88-92

From the Editor

The Cyclical Return: Rethinking Inequality as a Long- Wave Phenomenon

For much of the twentieth century, the study of economic inequality revolved around the search for a singular and secular trend, whether framed as Simon Kuznets’ optimistic inverted‑U[2] (whereby inequality would naturally fall with maturity) or, more recently, as Thomas Piketty’s formulation of r > g[3] as a driver of inexorable divergence. In recent years, a subtle but consequential consensus has taken shape within the field that attempts to reconcile these opposing visions by conceding that inequality can fall but insisting that it does so almost exclusively through the exogenous violence of war, revolution, or economic depression…

Letter from the Editor-in-Chief, August 2025

To our readers, It is with a deep sense of responsibility and earnest anticipation that I place before the learned reader the first number of the Economic & Political History Review. The founding of this journal arises from the conviction that the economic and political histories of India and South Asia deserve systematic and sustained scholarly attention, and that such inquiry should be pursued with the utmost care for accuracy, clarity, and balance…….



In “Literary Intervention”

Deep Priya Pabbi, 15 August 2025

One day, working in the kitchen, for the first time my mother asked me to reduce the amount of jeera (cumin) I was about to add to the tempering for dal. I could not comprehend the gentle orders. “Jeera is expensive these days”, she commented after seeing my confused look. With a more confused look I said, “What?”. “Hey Bhagwan, what a dumb daughter I have!”, I bet she must have thought. She explained, because Jeera is expensive these days we should use it less, so that those who cannot afford it, are also able to buy it……..

Announcements

Submissions for EPHR’s 5th Issue, releasing in August 2026, are currently open. Submissions are open for Research Commentaries, Research Notes, and Historiographical Essays on themes such as Agrarian and Industrial History, Colonial and Post Colonial Histories, Gender and Labour Markets, Intellectual and knowledge Histories, State Formation and Bureaucracy, Archives and Methods, and Demography.

Two opening essays are also invited from scholars on the theme of “Forgotten thinkers”.

Abstract Deadline: 29 July 2026

Submit Abstract at editor@ephr.in

Foundational Works

Historical Approach to Economics by Isaac A. Loos in The American Economic Review in 1918.

What Is Economic History: Comment by Harold F. Williamson in The Journal of Economic History in 1944.

Economic History and Economics by Robert M. Solow in The American Economic Review in 1985.

Statistics and Economic History by Simon Kuznets in The Journal of Economic History in 1941.

Intellectual History: Its Aims and Methods by Felix Gilbert in Historical Studies Today in 1971.

The “New Political History”: A Methodological CritiqueJ by Morgan Kousser in Reviews in American History in 1976.

On Political Methodology by Gary King in Political Analysis in 1990.

Meet Our Editors


Recent Issue