The Margins of Memory: Mirza BashiruddinMahmood Ahmad as a Twentieth CenturyPolitical Thinker

Author: Mudabbir Ahmad Tak, University of Kashmir

Editorial Summary:

This article revisits the political career of Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmood Ahmad, the second Caliph of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, with particular attention to his involvement in the Kashmir movement during the colonial period. It examines his early engagement with Kashmir, his role in establishing and leading the All-India Kashmir Committee, and his involvement in legal defence, fundraising, political advocacy, and constitutional debates. The article argues that these contributions have received limited attention in mainstream histories of Muslim politics in colonial India, where greater emphasis has often been placed on figures such as Sir Muhammad Iqbal. Drawing on published scholarship, contemporary newspapers, and Ahmadiyya historical sources, the study considers how sectarian divisions and later political developments have influenced historical interpretation. It calls for a fuller assessment of Mirza Bashiruddin’s political and institutional legacy.

Introduction

Modern historical writing on Muslim politics in colonial India has tended to organise itself around a few recurring names- Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Sir Muhammad Iqbal. Around these few names, entire subfields of biography and intellectual history have grown. Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmood Ahmad, the second Khalifa (Caliph) of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community from 1914 to 1965, rarely appears in this company. This despite him having built one of the first cross-sectarian political organisations in colonial India, the All-India Kashmir Committee (AIKC), and having personally directed a sustained campaign of advocacy, legal defence, and diplomatic pressure on behalf of Kashmiris living under Dogra rule. This article draws together the documented record of his political activity, much of which has been acknowledged even by scholars otherwise unsympathetic to the Ahmadiyya community, in order to make the case that Mirza Bashiruddin deserves to be treated as a serious subject of study in the political history of twentieth-century India, and that his relative absence from that history is itself a historiographical problem worth studying.

Early Engagement with Kashmir

Mirza Bashiruddin’s involvement with Kashmir did not begin with the crisis of July 1931, the year most historical accounts, including recent ones such as Rashid (2025), treat as the starting point of organised Muslim political activity on the issue. He had visited Kashmir for the first time in 1909, more than two decades before the events that made Kashmir a subject of all-India concern (Habib, 2020). In 1930, a year before the Kashmir Day meetings that are usually cited as the movement’s inaugural moment, he had already established the All Kashmir Muslim Social Uplift Association (Habib, 2020). This timeline matters because it complicates a historiographical convention in which Kashmiri Muslim political mobilisation is treated as beginning with the intervention of Punjabi Muslim leaders, Iqbal chief among them, in 1931. Mirza Bashiruddin’s engagement with Kashmiri grievances preceded that moment by more than twenty years, and his organisational groundwork preceded it by at least a year.

His personal account, recorded in Tarikh-e-Ahmadiyyat (Shahid, 2007), situates this engagement in family history as much as in contemporary politics- repeated visits to Kashmir, direct conversations with Kashmiri Ahmadi Muslims about the conditions of Dogra rule, and his grandfather’s earlier presence in the region during the period preceding the sale of Kashmir to the Dogras under the 1846 settlement. Whatever one makes of the religious framework in which Mirza Bashiruddin situated his interest in Kashmir, the documentary record indicates a sustained, decades-long personal engagement that predates the moment historians conventionally treat as the point of origin for Muslim political interest in the region.

Founding and Leading the All-India Kashmir Committee

The most concrete institutional achievement of Mirza Bashiruddin’s work in Kashmir was the establishment of the All-India Kashmir Committee (AIKC), of which he served as founding president. Even scholars who are otherwise critical of the Ahmadiyya role in Kashmiri politics have acknowledged that Mirza Bashiruddin was elected to this position with the active support and recommendation of non-Ahmadi leaders, including Sir Muhammad Iqbal himself (Ganai, 2003; Jalal, 2002; Kaur, 1996; Taseer, 1986). This is significant, as it shows that instead of being an Ahmadiyya vehicle imposed on reluctant Muslim leadership (as it has been projected by some scholars), AIKC was a body whose non-Ahmadi co-founders deliberately chose the then Ahmadi Khalifa to lead it. This was a development that, as one contemporary Urdu daily observed, became a ‘perfect choice’ because it set aside doctrinal difference in favour of competence (Daily Siasat, 1933).

Under Mirza Bashiruddin’s presidency, the AIKC became the first organisation in the history of the Kashmiri rights movement to draw together Muslims from across sectarian lines. The committee comprised of Shias, Sunnis of various schools, Wahhabis, and Ahmadis, all worked as a single body (Kaur, 1996). It was also, by scholarly consensus, highly effective. This is also in contrast to how some scholars like Rashid (2025) have characterised AIKC. Scholars, including Rashid (2025, p. 3), have downplayed the contributions of the AIKC, and credited what the AIKC achieved to other Muslim organisations and individuals such as Ahrar and Sir Muhammad Iqbal.

Amjad Hussain Khan’s (2012) research on the AIKC’s legal defence work documents a team of Ahmadi lawyers including Shaykh Bashir Ahmad, Chaudhry Muhammad Yusuf Khan, Shaykh Muhammad Ahmad Mazhar, and Chaudhry Asadullah Khan, who travelled to Jammu and Kashmir at their own expense to defend Kashmiris facing prosecution in the aftermath of the 1931 disturbances. Khan (2012) records that ‘hundreds of such cases… were acquitted or overturned’ through this legal effort (p. 1419). The AIKC also secured the important right of peasant proprietorship for Muslim agriculturists in Kashmir and Jammu (The Civil and Military Gazette, 15 May 1933).

Financing this work required a robust and strong fundraising apparatus, which Mirza Bashiruddin built through the Kashmir Relief Fund, a compulsory charitable levy on the earnings of Ahmadi community members (Khan, 2012). Khan (2012) further notes that many Ahmadis worked anonymously behind the scenes, contributing to what he calls ‘the hidden labour force of the independence movement’ (pp. 1417–1418). This proves wrong the characterisation of the AIKC’s work as primarily aimed at religious visibility or proselytising by scholars such as Rashid (2025, p. 17).

Diplomatic and Constitutional Engagement

Mirza Bashiruddin’s political activity was not confined to organisational and legal work inside India. He conducted a sustained programme of direct diplomatic engagement with the colonial government on Kashmir’s behalf. He met personally with the Viceroy of India, Lord Willingdon, on 1 August 1931, after having written multiple letters seeking to bring the situation in Kashmir to his attention (Habib, 2020). His deputy, Abdur Rahim Dard, the AIKC’s secretary, was sent to Srinagar to assess conditions on the ground. Dard notably refused the Maharaja’s offer of accommodation as a state guest, choosing instead to stay independently in a houseboat, a detail that historians such as Copland (1981) record even while otherwise treating the Ahmadiyya role with some scepticism.

Perhaps the clearest evidence of Mirza Bashiruddin’s stature as a political actor beyond the Kashmir question is his intervention in the 1937 debate over separate electorates at the All Parties Conference, an event at which Muhammad Ali Jinnah was also present. In his newspaper Hamdard, Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar, the co-founder of Jamia Millia Islamia, said that it was Mirza Bashiruddin who persuaded the assembled leaders (including Jinnah, who had favoured combined electorates) toward the position of separate electorates that would go on to shape the trajectory of Muslim constitutional politics in India (Ta’assurrat-e-Qadian, 1927/1933). The question of separate versus joint electorates became one of the defining fault lines of late colonial Indian politics, and one with direct bearing on the constitutional architecture that eventually produced the partition of India into two independent states of India and Pakistan. While Sir Muhammad Iqbal is often credited with the idea of the creation of Pakistan political awakening of Indian Muslims, Mirza Bashiruddin’s role in the decision on electorates is a substantive claim to political influence that has received strikingly little sustained scholarly attention outside of works specifically concerned with the Ahmadiyya community itself.

Mirza Bashiruddin also positioned Kashmir within a broader argument about the moral responsibility of the British government. In a widely circulated statement, he argued that the British government could not be absolved of the role it played in the sale of Kashmir and its inhabitants to the Dogra rulers through the Treaty of Amritsar in 1846 (Al Fazl, 18 July 1931, p. 12). While some scholars have framed this as a position of deference to colonial authority on the part of the Ahmadiyya community because of their alleged loyalty to the British, this could instead be framed as a sharp argument holding the colonial state accountable for the predicament of Kashmiris under the Dogra rule.

Beyond Kashmir: A Wider Political and Humanitarian Vision

Mirza Bashiruddin’s political thought extended beyond the immediate question of Kashmiri rights into a broader vision of Muslim political solidarity. Despite the Ahrar having been bitterly opposed to the Ahmadiyya thought, Mirza Bashiruddin personally wrote to Ahrar leaders such as Maulvi Mazhar Ali Azhar and Chaudhry Afzal Haq, as well as to other Muslim leaders such as Allama Iqbal [1], Maulvi Muhammad Ismail Ghaznavi, and Maulvi Ghulam Rasul Mehr, inviting them to join the AIKC, and, when told that his own position as head of the Ahmadiyya community was the obstacle to their cooperation, he even offered to resign the presidency if it would secure their participation (Al Fazl, 24 September 1931, p. 4). This episode, largely absent from standard accounts of the AIKC”s fracture, suggests that Mirza Bashiruddin was prepared to subordinate personal and institutional standing to the practical goal of Muslim unity on the Kashmir question. These historical facts are in contrast to the discourse of sectarian rigidity usually attributed to Ahmadiyya leadership in this period.

Mirza Bashiruddin’s influence also extended into the diplomatic sphere during the Second World War, when he issued counsel aimed at preventing military conflict in the vicinity of Mecca and Medina. The Cairo-based newspaper Zamzam responded to this intervention by noting that ‘the Imam Sahib… has shown such love for Islam with reference to Egypt and Holy Land of Hijaz that we are greatly indebted to him for it’ (Zamzam, 19 July 1942). Such interventions show that Mirza Bashiruddin’s outlook was situated within an international frame of Muslim political concern that extended beyond the boundaries of colonial India.

The Historical Erasure

Given this documented record, the comparative neglect of Mirza Bashiruddin in mainstream historical and political scholarship on colonial India requires investigation. Several factors appear to be at work.

The first is the retrospective application of later theological judgement to earlier historical narration. The 1974 constitutional amendment in Pakistan declaring Ahmadis non-Muslim, and the subsequent history of legal and social persecution (well documented by organisations such as the National Commission for Human Rights Pakistan and the US State Department) have influenced the historiography of the pre-Partition period. Scholars writing decades after these events have tended to read the sectarian conflicts of the 1930s through the lens of this later exclusion, treating Ahmadiyya political activity of the period as inherently suspect or self-interested. Case in point being the work of Rashid (2025) who, at various places in her work, blames Ahmadis for Muslim disunity because of their rigorous proselytisation, and for fostering a ‘state of inaction’ among Muslims because of their beliefs in the ‘eschatological return of the Messiah’ (Rashid, p. 4). Here, Rashid ignores the basic doctrinal beliefs of Islam- proselytisation is an important part of the Islamic faith (see The Holy Quran, 41:34). Even Sir Muhammad Iqbal outlined the importance of proselytisation in Islam.3 Although understood differently, a belief in the advent of the Messiah is also an important belief in Islam, held firmly not only by Ahmadis, but by non-Ahmadi Muslims as well (see The Holy Quran, 62: 3-4 and Sahih al-Bukhari 4897, Book 65, Hadith 417. Also see Bukhari, Vol. 1, Babo Nozool-e-Isa).

Rashid also de-contextualises major events in the history of Kashmir Movement at multiple occasions throughout the article and downplays the role of Mirza Bashiruddin (Rashid, p. 3). She also glorifies the actions of Iqbal and the Ahrar. For example, she writes that by September 1931, ‘the Ahrars and the Ahmadis, had taken an active interest in Kashmir’s political movement’. However, the Ahmadis had been active and taking interest in Kashmir much before 1931, since Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmood Ahmad had been visiting Kashmir since 1909 (Habib, 2020, p. 5). Mirza Bashiruddin had been working for the Kashmiri people even before he had been elected the caliph of the Ahmadiyyas and had established the All Kashmir Muslim Social Uplift Association in 1930, a year before the events of July 1931 and before the Ahrar began taking interest in Kashmir. The Ahrar’s involvement in Kashmir was, according to Rashid herself, solely based in doctrinal opposition to Ahmadis.

The second factor is the comparative prestige of literary and philosophical contribution over organisational and institutional contribution in the writing of intellectual history. Iqbal’s poetry has been given credit by some scholars as having inspired the political movement under the Dogra rule, while ignoring the more functional and practical work of fund-raising, legal defence, and diplomatic correspondence carried out by Mirza Bashiruddin. Mirza Bashiruddin’s contributions have thus been comparatively neglected in a field that has tended to treat poetic and philosophical output as the primary evidence of political seriousness. This has been noted by few scholars. For example, Iqbal’s own contribution to the AIKC after assuming its presidency amounted to convening no meetings before dissolving the committee altogether (Copland, 1981, p. 249). Also, the news that Iqbal had been appointed the president in Mirza Bashiruddin’s place was met with regret and a lack of trust in Iqbal’s leadership and his ability to carry forward the work that Mirza Bashiruddin had done (Jalal, 2000). Many, like the Unionist leader Ahmad Yar Daultana bemoaned the inability of Iqbal to get things done and his history of never having led any practical steps for the Kashmir Movement (Majid, 1991). Also, many scholars tend to lean towards a historically flawed narrative that the Ahmadis were loyal to the British. Such scholars tend to ignore Iqbal’s (some might argue excessive) praise of the British throughout his life.[2]

The third factor is the tendency of certain scholarly works to fold the Ahmadiyya community’s political activity into narratives primarily organised around the Ahrar–Ahmadi doctrinal dispute, rather than around Kashmir itself. This has the effect of converting Mirza Bashiruddin from a political actor engaged with the material conditions of Kashmiri Muslims into a symbol within someone else’s theological argument- a shift that Sheikh and Raja (2024) describe, in a related context, as part of a broader pattern in the ‘othering’ of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community through selective historical narration.

The consequences of this omission are that the contributions of Mirza Bashiruddin, along with those of the Ahmadiyya community, are framed as part of their program of religious proselytisation and self-centred interests. A fuller historical accounting of Mirza Bashiruddin’s role would necessarily revise the standard narrative in which the AIKC’s achievements are attributed primarily to the moral authority of Iqbal’s poetry, and in which the committee’s decline is treated as an inevitability rather than as the direct consequence of the internal sabotage documented by the Ahrar’s own historians (Kashmiri, 1960; Mirza, 1968/1975; Mirza, 1977). It would also invite a reconsideration of how minority political contribution in colonial India more broadly has been filtered through post-colonial sectarian judgement. Mirza Bashiruddin’s works merit treatment on their own terms, rather than as a footnote to the biographies of better-remembered contemporaries.

Conclusion

Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmood Ahmad’s contributions illustrate a broader problem in the historiography of Muslim South Asia- the tendency for institutional and organisational contribution to be overshadowed by literary reputation, and for the political record of a minority community to be read retrospectively through the lens of its later persecution rather than through an objective lens of its documented history. As discussed above, Mirza Bashiruddin built the first cross-sectarian political institution in the Kashmiri rights movement, sustained it through a genuine legal and financial apparatus, engaged directly with the highest levels of colonial government, and influenced constitutional debates whose consequences extended well beyond Kashmir itself. A political history of twentieth-century India that continues to treat this record as marginal is incomplete. What is worse, it reproduces, in the writing of history, the exclusions that were first enacted in the politics of the 1930s.

Notes

[1] Makatib Iqbal (Letters of Iqbal), Letter to Niyaz-ud-Din Khan, p. 53.

[2] See Iqbal’s ten page ode to Queen Victoria on her death in 1901 titled ‘Tears of Blood’ in Baqiyyat-e-Iqbal, compiled by Syed Abdul Wahid Moeeni, Koh Noor Press, Delhi, 1953, p. 71–90. Also, on p. 206 of the same book, see Iqbal’s poem titled ‘Our King’ written on the occasion of the coronation of King George V in 1911. Iqbal also showered praise upon the British in prose, see Harf-i Iqbal, 1930, p. 167.

Bibliography

1. Ahmad, M. B. M. (1935). Political solidarity of Islam: Fatwas of kufr and their significance. Nazarat Nashr-o-Ishaat, Qadian.
2. Al Fazl. (1931, July 18). p. 12.
3. Al Fazl. (1931, September 24). p. 4.
4. Chawla, I. (2011). Role of the Majlis-i-Ahrar Islam-Hind in the Kashmir Movement of 1931. Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies, 3(2), 82-102.
5. The Civil and Military Gazette. (1933, May 15). p. 3.
6. Copland, I. (1981). Islam and political mobilization in Kashmir, 1931–34. Pacific Affairs, 54(2), 228–259.
7. Ganai, M. Y. (2003). Kashmir’s struggle for independence (1931–1939). Gulshan Books.
8. Habib, N. A. (2020). The London Ahmadiyya Mission and the Kashmir Movement. Journal of South Asian Studies, 8(1), 1–11.
9. Jalal, A. (2002). Self and sovereignty: Individual and community in South Asian Islam since 1850. Routledge.
10. Kaur, R. (1996). Political awakening in Kashmir. APH Publishing.
11. Kashmiri, A. S. (1960). Syed Ataullah Shah Bukhari: Sawaneh wa Afkar. Matbu’at-e Chitan.
12. Khan, A. H. (2012). The Kashmir crisis as a political platform for Jama’at-i-Ahmadiyya’s entrance into South Asian politics. Modern Asian Studies, 46(5), 1398–1428.
13. Majid, S. A. (1991). Iqbal aur Ahmadiyat (Critique of Dr Javed Iqbal’s Zinda Rawad). Choudhry Irshad Ahmad Wark, Lahore.
14. Mirza, J. (1968). Tarikh-e-Ahrar. Maktaba-e-Majlis Ahrar-e-Islam Pakistan.
15. Mirza, J. (1975). Karwan-e-Ahrar (Vol. 1). Maktabah Tabsarah.
16. Mirza, J. (1977). Karwan-e-Ahrar (Vol. 2). Maktaba-e-Majlis Ahrar-e-Islam Pakistan.
17. Rashid, I. (2025). The Muslim aporia?: A community’s quest for rights in Kashmir. Global Intellectual History, 1–32.
18. Shahid, M. D. (2007). Tareekh-e-Ahmadiyyat (History of Ahmadiyyat, Vol. 5). Nazarat Nashr-o-Ishaat, Qadian.
19. Sheikh, L. A., & Raja, R. (2024). The othering of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community: Constructing narratives. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 32(1), 1–23.
20. Taseer, C. B. (1986). The Kashmir of Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah. Feroz sons Pvt. Ltd.
21. Zamzam. (1942, July 19).